Immigrants vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Ute
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Ute
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.040%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 26.5% |
| Range | 18.8% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.6% |
| Median | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |