Immigrants from Western Asia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Ute
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Ute
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,333,266 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.56%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Ute |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 26.5% |
| Range | 9.3% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |