Immigrants from Croatia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Ute
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Ute
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Ute Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,566,129 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Ute |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 25.4% | 26.5% |
| Range | 24.5% | 24.8% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Ute by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Greek (6.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |