Immigrants from Korea vs Burmese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Burmese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Burmese
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Burmese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,570,089 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,418,489 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 0.68% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 9.0% |
| Range | 14.6% | 8.3% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 0.51% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Burmese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Sweden (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (2.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |