Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Burmese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Burmese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Burmese
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Burmese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,457,724 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,418,489 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.68% |
| Maximum | 4.2% | 9.0% |
| Range | 4.0% | 8.3% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.51% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.69% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.69% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Burmese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Ethiopian (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.2%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |