Immigrants from Korea vs Burmese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Burmese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Burmese
11.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Burmese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,882,145 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,783,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.61%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Burmese |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 48.2% | 48.2% |
Range | 46.5% | 46.5% |
Mean | 11.1% | 11.4% |
Median | 9.6% | 9.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Burmese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |