Immigrants from Korea vs Ethiopian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Ethiopian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Ethiopians
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Ethiopian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,570,089 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,073,982 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 3.2%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 15.3% | 3.4% |
| Range | 14.6% | 3.2% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.57% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.63% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 0.63% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Ethiopians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Burmese (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Luxembourger (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (2.2%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |