Turkish vs Burmese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Burmese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Turks
Burmese
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Burmese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,627,212 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,418,489 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.74%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Burmese |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.68% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 9.0% |
| Range | 4.0% | 8.3% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 0.51% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Burmese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Venezuelan (2.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Cypriot (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Inupiat (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Danish (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |