Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Zimbabwean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Zimbabweans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,030,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| Range | 9.1% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Guatemala (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Cambodian (2.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |