Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Laotian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Laotians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Laotian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,832,654 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.34%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Laotian |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 5.3% | 8.6% |
| Range | 4.3% | 8.0% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.7% |
| Median | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Laotians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |