Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Poland Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Immigrants from Poland
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Immigrants from Poland
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Poland Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 5.3% | 20.5% |
| Range | 4.3% | 19.6% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 4.7% |
| Median | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Poland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |