Immigrants from Congo vs Albanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Albanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Albanians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
66.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Albanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,119,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,249,073 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Albanian |
| Minimum | 0.95% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 5.3% | 9.2% |
| Range | 4.3% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.3% |
| Median | 3.0% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Albanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |