Immigrants from China vs Afghan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Afghan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Afghans
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Afghan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,854,459 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Afghan |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 9.8% |
| Range | 12.3% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| Median | 4.8% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Afghans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Australia (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |