Immigrants from China vs American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Americans
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 581,324,022 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.575 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 39.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | American |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 35.3% |
| Range | 12.3% | 32.5% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 12.5% |
| Median | 4.8% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Osage (7.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Apache (7.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Potawatomi (7.3%, a difference of 1.2%), Navajo (7.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and Comanche (7.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |