Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Immigrants from Jordan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 6.7% |
| Range | 21.0% | 6.3% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Median | 3.6% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |