Immigrants from Australia vs Japanese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Japanese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Japanese
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
46.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Japanese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,105,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Japanese |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 11.9% |
| Range | 21.0% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 3.9% |
| Median | 3.6% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia and Japanese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Philippines (3.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Panamanian (3.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Romania (3.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Indonesian (3.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Serbia (3.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
| Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |