Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,190,203 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,945,747 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 0.46%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 6.9% |
| Range | 9.7% | 6.1% |
| Mean | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.70% | 0.63% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.92% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (2.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and South American (2.7%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Paraguayan (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South America (2.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Jamaican (2.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Singapore (2.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (2.7%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Venezuelans | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Paraguayans | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |