Estonian vs Immigrants from Kenya Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Estonian
Immigrants from Kenya
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Estonians
Immigrants from Kenya
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Immigrants from Kenya Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,516,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,037,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Estonian | Immigrants from Kenya |
Minimum | 0.64% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 24.6% | 15.8% |
Range | 24.0% | 14.6% |
Mean | 7.0% | 6.9% |
Median | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Immigrants from Kenya by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Morocco (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |