Estonian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Estonian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Estonians
Immigrants from Middle Africa
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,516,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,691,189 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.13%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 22.3% |
| Range | 24.0% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.4% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |