Egyptian vs Creek Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Egyptian
Creek
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Egyptians
Creek
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Creek Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,747,097 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,427,541 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 74.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Creek |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 9.2% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 56.7% |
| Range | 18.9% | 47.4% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 24.6% |
| Median | 8.3% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 29.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Turkey (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cuba (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Belarus (9.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Armenia (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.86%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |