Danish vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Danish
Pima
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Danes
Pima
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,961,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 4.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 49.1% | 13.0% |
| Range | 48.2% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Basque (3.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 1.4%), French American Indian (3.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Scandinavian (3.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |