Danish vs Swiss Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Danish
Swiss
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Danes
Swiss
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Swiss Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,961,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,835,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 3.5%, a difference of 0.32%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Swiss |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 49.1% | 25.0% |
| Range | 48.2% | 24.5% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 5.1% |
| Median | 4.9% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Swiss by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and European (3.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |