Swedish vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Swedish
Pima
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Swedes
Pima
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,765,459 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 2.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swedish | Pima |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 13.0% |
Range | 45.0% | 12.0% |
Mean | 7.0% | 5.4% |
Median | 4.5% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Scandinavian (3.6%, a difference of 0.090%), French American Indian (3.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |