Immigrants from Peru vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Pima
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Pima
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,787,058 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 37.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 13.2% | 13.0% |
| Range | 13.0% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 5.4% |
| Median | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.85% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Immigrants from Eritrea (2.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (2.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Colombia (2.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Indian (Asian) (2.7%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Jamaicans | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Ethiopians | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 98.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.4 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |