Danish vs Spanish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Danish
Spanish
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Danes
Spanish
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Spanish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,961,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,995,316 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 2.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Spanish |
Minimum | 0.96% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 49.1% | 35.7% |
Range | 48.2% | 35.5% |
Mean | 7.7% | 8.4% |
Median | 4.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Spanish by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Nonimmigrants (3.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |