Danish vs Russian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Danish
Russian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Danes
Russians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Russian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,917,360 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.95%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Russian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 51.6% | 75.4% |
| Range | 50.4% | 74.4% |
| Mean | 7.5% | 9.5% |
| Median | 6.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Russians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |