Choctaw vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Choctaw
 Ugandan
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Choctaw
Ugandans
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Ugandan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 45.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Ugandan | 
| Minimum | 4.5% | 1.4% | 
| Maximum | 30.3% | 14.2% | 
| Range | 25.8% | 12.8% | 
| Mean | 13.7% | 5.7% | 
| Median | 12.8% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 4.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 7.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 2.3% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 9.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86  | Exceptional 5.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90  | Exceptional 5.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91  | Exceptional 5.8%  |