Chippewa vs Ute Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Ute
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Ute
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Ute Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,653,653 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Ute | 
| Minimum | 0.77% | 1.2% | 
| Maximum | 8.4% | 7.6% | 
| Range | 7.6% | 6.4% | 
| Mean | 3.1% | 2.9% | 
| Median | 2.7% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Ute by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Belize (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% |