Pennsylvania German vs Welsh Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Pennsylvania German
Welsh
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Pennsylvania Germans
Welsh
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pennsylvania German vs Welsh Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,065,533 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,244,925 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.76%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pennsylvania German | Welsh |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 60.0% |
| Range | 30.3% | 58.1% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 10.7% |
| Median | 4.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pennsylvania Germans and Welsh by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pennsylvania Germans are Scottish (3.7%, a difference of 0.030%), German (3.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch (3.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Menominee (3.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% |
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% |