Cajun vs Welsh Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Cajun
 Welsh
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Cajuns
Welsh
3.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Welsh Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,482 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,244,925 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 6.2%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Welsh | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 13.2% | 60.0% | 
| Range | 11.9% | 58.1% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 10.7% | 
| Median | 4.4% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 13.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 8.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 10.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 10.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Welsh by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Hopi (3.9%, a difference of 0.11%), American (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Cree (3.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Scotch-Irish (3.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and Ottawa (3.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 3.9% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 3.9% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 3.9% |