Chickasaw vs Japanese Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Japanese
Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Comparison
Chickasaw
Japanese
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 55 TO 59 YEARS
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 55 TO 59 YEARS
54.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Japanese Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,352,588 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 55 and 59 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,768,181 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 55 and 59 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.45%.

Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.90% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 15.2% |
Range | 42.0% | 13.8% |
Mean | 10.2% | 5.9% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Japanese by Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nicaragua (4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Slovak (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Africa (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Nicaraguan (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sudan (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Croatia (4.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 55 to 59 years |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 66.3 /100 | #155 | Good 4.8% |
Italians | 66.2 /100 | #156 | Good 4.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 66.0 /100 | #157 | Good 4.8% |
Slovaks | 65.3 /100 | #158 | Good 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 65.2 /100 | #159 | Good 4.8% |
Chickasaw | 65.1 /100 | #160 | Good 4.8% |
Koreans | 64.6 /100 | #161 | Good 4.8% |
Immigrants | Africa | 64.2 /100 | #162 | Good 4.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 4.8% |
Americans | 63.3 /100 | #164 | Good 4.8% |
Immigrants | France | 62.0 /100 | #165 | Good 4.8% |
Potawatomi | 62.0 /100 | #166 | Good 4.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 60.4 /100 | #167 | Good 4.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 59.3 /100 | #168 | Average 4.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 58.4 /100 | #169 | Average 4.8% |
Uruguayans | 55.6 /100 | #170 | Average 4.8% |
Japanese | 54.5 /100 | #171 | Average 4.8% |
Nicaraguans | 54.0 /100 | #172 | Average 4.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 52.2 /100 | #173 | Average 4.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 4.8% |
Australians | 48.6 /100 | #175 | Average 4.8% |