British vs African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
British
African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
British
Africans
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,824,822 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 13.0%.
![British vs African Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/british-vs-africans-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | African |
Minimum | 0.87% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 27.3% |
Range | 99.1% | 25.7% |
Mean | 13.1% | 9.7% |
Median | 8.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 10.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to British by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |