British vs Immigrants from Congo Disability
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from Congo
Disability
Disability Comparison
British
Immigrants from Congo
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from Congo Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,410,774 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,123,108 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.24%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 98.5% | 21.1% |
| Range | 95.0% | 16.5% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 12.3% |
| Median | 17.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from Congo by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chinese (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Yugoslavian (12.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Samoans | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Malaysians | 2.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Italians | 2.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |