British vs Swiss Disability
COMPARE
British
Swiss
Disability
Disability Comparison
British
Swiss
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Swiss Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,410,774 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.040%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Swiss |
Minimum | 3.5% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 98.5% | 40.6% |
Range | 95.0% | 37.9% |
Mean | 21.7% | 12.9% |
Median | 17.5% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to British and Swiss by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to British are Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Carpatho Rusyn (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |
German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% |