Australian vs Romanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Australian
 Romanian
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Australians
Romanians
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
8.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Romanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,103,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,801,954 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 0.98%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Romanian | 
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.091% | 
| Maximum | 21.9% | 24.7% | 
| Range | 21.4% | 24.6% | 
| Mean | 4.6% | 4.9% | 
| Median | 3.7% | 3.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Australians and Romanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bangladeshi (3.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (3.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Russian (3.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and New Zealander (3.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Cape Verdean (3.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (3.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Pakistani (3.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Iraq (3.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Denmark | 16.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Alsatians | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Eastern Europeans | 15.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 12.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 12.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Romanians | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Pakistanis | 11.1 /100 | #212 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Immigrants | Iraq | 10.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 3.1% | 
| Australians | 8.1 /100 | #214 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Bangladeshis | 8.1 /100 | #215 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Russians | 7.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |