Sioux vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sioux
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sioux
Zimbabweans
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Sioux Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,977,802 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.565. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 31.7 Zimbabweans.
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $45,804, a difference of 35.0%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $90,618, a difference of 33.7%), and median family income ($82,386 compared to $110,011, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $51,259, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $40,798, a difference of 16.4%).
Income Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,921 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,386 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,792 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,448 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,566 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,063 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,417 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,089 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,750 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,509 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.3% | Fair 26.3% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 113.2%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 103.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 39.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.3%).
Poverty Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.6% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 22.2% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.8% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 83.0%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 6.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.5% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.2% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.0% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.54%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.52 compared to 3.20, a difference of 9.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.52 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.0% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.8% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Good 6.4% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Education Level Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.4% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.0% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.1% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.7%).
Disability Metric | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.7% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |