South American vs Uruguayan 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
South American
Uruguayan
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
South Americans
Uruguayans
51.9%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
52.7%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Uruguayan 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,722,919 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.189 and weighted average of 51.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,759,773 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623 and weighted average of 52.7%, a difference of 1.4%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 8.3% | 26.8% |
Maximum | 85.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 77.2% | 73.2% |
Mean | 48.5% | 57.4% |
Median | 52.0% | 57.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.8% | 49.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.4% | 65.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Uruguayans by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Subsaharan African (51.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Israeli (51.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ireland (52.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Honduran (52.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pima (52.0%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Malaysia (52.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (52.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (52.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Nigerian (52.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Central American Indian (52.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 52.8% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 52.7% |
Uruguayans | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 52.7% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.7 /100 | #256 | Tragic 52.6% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 0.6 /100 | #257 | Tragic 52.6% |
Central American Indians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 52.5% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 52.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 52.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.5 /100 | #261 | Tragic 52.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 52.3% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 0.4 /100 | #263 | Tragic 52.3% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.4 /100 | #264 | Tragic 52.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.3 /100 | #265 | Tragic 52.1% |
Immigrants | France | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 52.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 52.0% |
Pima | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 52.0% |
Hondurans | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 52.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 52.0% |
South Americans | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 51.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #272 | Tragic 51.9% |
Israelis | 0.2 /100 | #273 | Tragic 51.9% |