Icelander vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Icelander
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Icelanders
Chileans
9.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,468,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Chilean |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 17.9% | 18.4% |
| Range | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 7.6% |
| Median | 4.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Korea (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |