Immigrants from Norway vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Chileans
11.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,532,491 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 15.6%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Chilean |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 18.4% |
Range | 12.1% | 16.7% |
Mean | 6.4% | 7.6% |
Median | 5.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Japan (11.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (11.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Uruguayans | 7.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 5.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |