Immigrants from the Azores vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Chileans
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,204,339 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Chilean |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 23.2% | 18.4% |
| Range | 22.1% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 7.6% |
| Median | 7.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |