Icelander vs Chilean Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Icelander
Chilean
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Icelanders
Chileans
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Chilean Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,567,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,527,062 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.0%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Chilean |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.69% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 4.7% |
| Range | 14.6% | 4.0% |
| Mean | 2.9% | 2.2% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.57% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Chileans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Jordan (2.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Macedonian (2.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Asia (2.4%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Ugandan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Indian (Asian) (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.7 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Icelanders | 97.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Macedonians | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 96.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.4% |