Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Chileans
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,565,234 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.311 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 0.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Chilean |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 18.4% |
| Range | 17.1% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 7.6% |
| Median | 8.6% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |