Choctaw vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Choctaw
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Choctaw
Chileans
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,114,362 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 25.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Chilean |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 18.4% |
| Range | 15.4% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.4% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Spanish (7.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Northern European (7.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |