Brazilian vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Brazilians
Chileans
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
51.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,964,874 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 5.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Chilean |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 32.9% | 18.4% |
| Range | 31.6% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 7.6% |
| Median | 9.0% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Hmong (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latin America (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Filipino (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
| Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
| Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
| Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
| Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
| Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |
| French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 48.0 /100 | #178 | Average 10.4% |
| Ethiopians | 45.8 /100 | #179 | Average 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |