Spaniard vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Spaniard
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Spaniards
Chileans
8.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spaniard vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,901,498 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.456 and weighted average of 8.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 18.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spaniard | Chilean |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 33.6% | 18.4% |
| Range | 31.3% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 7.6% |
| Median | 6.3% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Spaniards by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Iran (8.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Scotland (8.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.46%), Canadian (8.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Cajun (8.4%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |