Icelander vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Icelander
Bahamian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Icelanders
Bahamians
9.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Bahamian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,468,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 2.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Bahamian |
Minimum | 0.55% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 17.9% | 21.9% |
Range | 17.4% | 20.5% |
Mean | 4.9% | 9.3% |
Median | 4.3% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |