Chippewa vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chippewa
Chilean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chippewa
Chileans
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Chilean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,718,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 4.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Chilean |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 18.4% |
| Range | 37.7% | 16.7% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 7.6% |
| Median | 9.5% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Japanese (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Navajo (9.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Armenians | 95.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |