Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chickasaw Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Europe
Chickasaw
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Western Europe
Chickasaw
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chickasaw Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,944,202 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Europe | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 17.6% |
Range | 97.1% | 17.1% |
Mean | 14.5% | 5.6% |
Median | 6.8% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.9% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.5% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Europe and Chickasaw by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 91.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 91.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 90.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 89.7 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |