Chippewa vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Jordan
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Jordan
6.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Jordan Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,753,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,116,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.20% |
| Maximum | 41.6% | 11.7% |
| Range | 41.0% | 11.5% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 5.2% |
| Median | 7.2% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Haitian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |