Chippewa vs Mexican American Indian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Chippewa
Mexican American Indian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Chippewa
Mexican American Indians
6.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Mexican American Indian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,753,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,627,877 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.846 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Mexican American Indian |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 41.6% | 52.0% |
| Range | 41.0% | 50.8% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 9.5% |
| Median | 7.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Mexican American Indians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Haitian (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Guatemalan (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (6.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Yaqui (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Colville (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.1% |